6896o4t8iN
Yangcheng Evening News reporter Zheng Xusen,abercrombie factory outlet, Zhong Lin intern correspondent reported Haifa declared: part-hsiu (a pseudonym) after leaving domestic companies to provide services for the original company still customers. The company under its repeated persuasion failed,hollister sales uk hollister plus size, the hsiu to court for compensation. Recently,vest abercrombie,http://www.xinhelan.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, the case in Haizhu District of Guangzhou City People's Court pronounced the verdict. It is noteworthy that, tort compensation payments hsiu and domestic companies in the "labor contract" agreed in court has not been adopted.
Hsiu This is a domestic company in Guangzhou City staff, according to the company's schedule, she is responsible for providing clean Haizhu District Everbright Garden District customers,saldi hogan scarpe hogan uomo grigie, and do dinner and other housekeeping services.
December 17, 2010, hsiu and corporate renewal of the "labor contract", where agreed, after leaving employees to existing customers engaged in acts of cleaning and catering services belong to acts of unfair competition, should take to stop unfair competition law behavior, not less than 10,000 yuan compensation for losses and investigation costs and other legal obligations.
December 19,http://vmdkix8b3i.hatenablog.com/entry/2014/09/05/133257, 2010, the next day to renew the contract after hsiu he left the company,http://www.importia.com/index.php/forum/newtopic, and the company continues to provide housekeeping services in the client's home.
In the case of domestic companies persuasion failed, the paper petition hsiu court, claims the defendant was ordered to immediately stop the plaintiff in the customer's home cleaning and catering services act; defendant was ordered to pay damages to the plaintiff 10,000 yuan and investigation costs 1,500 yuan,escarpins louboutin prix louboutin homme sneakers, a total of 11,500 yuan; and bear all legal costs in this case.
Trial, hsiu argued themselves from future December 19,http://wap.wxrb.com/supesite/?action-viewnews-itemid-20, 2010 to leave the company, there is no Everbright Garden District in cleaning work.
For this purpose the plaintiff the defendant access to the court for investigation Haizhu District, Guangzhou, China Everbright Garden District record since December 19,http://www.zmd396.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=49412, 2010.
Courts do this to Haizhu District,hollister tee shirts hollister outlet stores uk, Guangzhou,mulberry bag blue mulberry mens wallets,http://www.menqiu.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, China Everbright Garden District Management Office and obtain the related videos (7). Video content is displayed,hogan prezzi hogan rebel italy, the defendant in the April 11,http://www.zhaoshance.cn/thread-97743-1-1.html, 2011 at 12:00 on the 21st and the two Everbright Garden District home. In this regard, hsiu saying these times in the trial were the owners house to play, chat with the owners.
Court that the defendant in the trial process on its departure from the plaintiff's statement of whether the plaintiff before the client's home is inconsistent, which can not provide a reasonable explanation,jordan mars air jordan 1 mid, thus proving the defendant left the company after the plaintiff has to the plaintiff client's home in domestic service behavior.
The court held that the defendant in order to achieve the purpose of profit,piumino woolrich prezzi, in violation of the "Labor Contract" agreement to provide services,adidas zero adidas f50 tunit, is unfair competition,http://fu305357867.com/news/html/?85757.html,louboutin price ou acheter louboutin, intentional tort has subjective. But not in accordance with the "Labor Contract" agreed compensation payments imposed hsiu 10,000 yuan compensation for domestic companies.
The court held that the plaintiff failed to adduce evidence to prove its infringement because the defendant suffered economic losses or profits obtained by the defendant because of the infringement, the court adopted the principle of discretionary judgment of the law, at the discretion of the defendant to compensate 5000 yuan (including the plaintiff to stop the infringement reasonable expenses incurred). The plaintiff claims damages beyond the amount of 5000 yuan outside the court not support it.
