November 23

Xiachu Hui (left) of activism by the media attention (picture)
■ News tracking
 
The "one dollar lawsuit," tossing into the provincial government and 21 prefecture-level city government for public information, and then lift the 15 administrative review, Jieyang two Disabled Xiachu Hui yesterday finally relieved --- Guangdong provincial government to make a reconsideration decision , said the government extended reply violation of "Open Government Information." "This result is unexpected, the government took the courage to admit mistakes, I feel the sunshine government's attitude."
 
Yangcheng Evening News reporter Wang Xiaoyun
 
Because one yuan fare court wrote to the provincial government asked the policy fine
 
The first round of court because one yuan fare
 
Xiachu Hui is Jiedong Jieyang City, 9 years old was amputated due to a car crash, holding two disability certificate.
 
November 23, 2008 morning, he hitched a ride Haizhu Bus 9 bus, the car produced a disabled card,chaussure nike tn pas cher, but the driver told him "that the card can not enjoy the benefits," he had to put in two yuan coins, and ask for a ticket.
 
"The next day, I went to Guangzhou City Industry and Commerce Bureau complaint,http://bbs.cnw.com.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, that he should at least halve enjoy preferential payment, requires first bus to return the overcharged one yuan fee."
 
Soon, Xiachu Hui Guangzhou First Bus Company received a reply, saying the two disabled card holders can enjoy the Guangzhou public transport concessions. But he was not satisfied: this should not be replied by the complaints unit, should come forward to answer the Guangzhou Municipal Industrial and Commercial Bureau.
 
In February 2009, he sued the Guangzhou Trade and Industry Bureau in Guangzhou's Tianhe District Court administrative proceedings, on the grounds that the business sector could not within the statutory time limit to respond to his complaints. Then the court ruling, the Guangzhou City Industry and Commerce Bureau confirm reply timeout illegal. But in view of the business sector has been given Xiachu Hui reply during the proceedings, so no need to re-investigate.
 
Before waiting for the Tianhe district court's decision, a small summer turn Guangzhou First Bus Company sued Guangzhou Yuexiu District Court --- "according to May 1, 2007 start of the" Guangdong Province, help people with disabilities "provides blind and severe (a) physically disabled people with disabled card free use of urban public transport in the city, other persons with disabled card can enjoy free or half pay concessions. "
 
The second round of a letter to the provincial government asked the policy fine
 
Disabled concessionary travel is not subject to account restrictions? Provincial and municipal regulations - why? Concerted practices around it,christian louboutin roma?
 
Holding a bunch of questions, Xiachu Hui decided to "less seriously."
 
By the end of November 2008, he sent a letter to the provincial government, "information disclosure application", the Guangdong provincial government requires 10 working days according to the law in a written reply two questions: First, based on my "disabled card" is entitled to Enjoy Guangzhou city public transport free or half pay benefits? How time can not enjoy the benefits of the treatment? The second is "help people with disabilities," How is the implementation in Guangdong province?
 
Then he sprouted to all prefecture-level cities of the province to know whether persons with disabilities to concessionary travel ideas.
 
Xiachu Hui Jieyang back after he spent 80 yuan to the province's 21 prefecture-level city government sent a "message open application" registered letter, ask yourself whether we can enjoy local public transport concessions.
 
And to answer another.
 
"Huizhou is the first phone contact my according CDPF statement Huizhou, Huizhou city government on ways to help people with disabilities are not yet available to the provincial government" approach to help people with disabilities in Guangdong Province "shall prevail."
 
Xiachu Hui said that the most satisfying is the answer Shantou,http://bbs.cnw.com.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=,christian louboutin chaussures, contents up to 3, said that under the "Shantou help people with disabilities," domicile is not in the administrative area of the city,http://bbs.cnw.com.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, with "disabled card" to free or half take local buses and ferries.
 
"There's responded that is not clear, but most will not answer."
 
"Normal deadline should give me a reply within 15 days, to the provincial government and other 14 prefecture-level city government did not respond on time." Xiachu Hui decided contests in the end.
 
By the end of December 2008, he extended reply regarding, respectively, filed 15 administrative reconsideration to the provincial government.
 
Last February,http://www.mydiyclub.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, the provincial government administrative reconsideration office responded that the law applicable because the case involving the question of how to define the problem behavior for government information disclosure and complaint behavior, need to consult the State Council Legislative Affairs Office, it suspended the administrative reconsideration.
 
May 28 this year,http://bbs.cnw.com.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, Mr. Xia received a letter from the Office of the Guangdong Provincial Administrative Reconsideration "Restoring the administrative reconsideration review notice", saying that "the reasons for the suspension have been eliminated, the present government decided: to restore the above from May 25,tiffany milano, 2010 15 reconsideration of the review. "
 
Final outcome: Reply "late" indeed illegal
 
Yesterday, the Yangcheng Evening News reporter learned Xiachu Hui has received a reconsideration of the decision of the provincial government.
 
"The decision said, after receiving the application for administrative reconsideration of the applicant, the provincial government leadership attaches great importance to the case, sent the Provincial Office of Legislative Affairs, the provincial federations and other relevant departments have met with the applicant for a special discussion and answers. However, the provincial government should be informed in writing within 15 days of the case, although the government has commissioned the provincial federations within the statutory time limit for handling phone told Mr. Xia situation, but does not meet the requirements of the applicant in writing, although the provincial federations in 2009 On July 9 the written replies and served on the applicant, but the answer has exceeded the legal time limit, in violation of the "information disclosure regulations." "
 
In addition to the provincial government, the Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Foshan, Jiangmen, Zhongshan, Dongguan, Maoming, Chaozhou, Qingyuan, Shanwei, Meizhou, Zhanjiang were confirmed violation "Information Disclosure Ordinance" (Jieyang reconsideration parties have withdrawal). Provincial government to apply for open government are collectively responded, in reply, said, "Province to help people with disabilities" as the Guangdong provincial government regulations, once enacted,gioielli tiffany outlet, the range from May 1, 2007 in the province full implementation, as the specific "implementation of how the situation in Guangdong Province,http://www.yqtxt.net/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=," the provincial government is required after the province's law enforcement inspection to master, this is not the government can immediately upon request public information.
 
Visible, Guangdong Province, "help people with disabilities" is an important legal basis, but around the grounds but not the same reply, the differences in local law enforcement or legislative gaps in understanding exist?
 
Reporter yesterday from the Guangdong Provincial Department of CDPF activist is known for its staff in accordance with the "Guangdong Province to help people with disabilities", including in the field of persons with disabilities, including people with disabilities are treated equally and does not discriminate, so there is no on legislation issues. In fact, the same laws and regulations, there are differences over the law enforcement is not uncommon, provincial federations will work with the provincial Office of Legislative Affairs, to the inspection and supervision over the implementation of the province's regulations.
 
Rights reflections: I support the law
 
Get this result, Xiachu Hui finally relieved, he wrote, "really hope the stars hope the moon ah." Yesterday, the Yangcheng Evening News reporter interviewed him in a blog.
 
Yangcheng Evening News: the "one dollar lawsuit," tossing into the provincial government and 21 prefecture-level city government for public information,http://www.yqtxt.net/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, and then lift the 15 administrative review, in the end is how you think?
 
Xiachu Hui: At first I was very angry, through in-depth understanding, found in many places in the protection of persons with disabilities transportation benefits are not implemented. Just the state introduced a government information disclosure regulations, I think the disclosure of government information through to understand the country is to give me enjoy public transport concessions, but also to prove that I do not want to bus drivers are disabled on rogue relied on their own, refused to pay the fare a legitimate right granted by the government.
 
Yangcheng Evening News: Just because a dollar, you "toss out" so much, some people do not understand that you "eat can make it," how do you see?
 
Xiachu Hui: As a disabled person,http://www.51yam.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, I was unlucky, but as a person living in a society ruled by law, I was lucky. I do not need sympathy. Today I use a prosthetic leg and a stand here supporting me is the law. Get on the bus is my legal rights as persons with disabilities, and instead of enjoying what people give me mercy.
 
Yangcheng Evening News: Now wait until the results of such a review, you satisfied?
 
Xiachu Hui: Actually, at first I was not optimistic about the results have been, but I think the strength of citizens can promote a more efficient government, I believe that after this incident with the government will be more timely reply to the applicant. I really did not expect to have such a reconsideration final result, unexpectedly, the government took the courage to admit mistakes, I feel the sunshine government's attitude. I am very satisfied.